Com-Pac Yacht Owners Association

Com-Pac Model Specific Discussions => CP-16's => Topic started by: konstan on October 14, 2020, 04:26:04 AM

Title: Looking at 2001 Mercury 3.3 for my CP16
Post by: konstan on October 14, 2020, 04:26:04 AM
Looking at a local listing for a 2001 Mercury 3.3 for my cp16.
2 stroke, short shaft, looks like in good condition. Forward and neutral only.
Will I be able to spin it around for reverse?
Title: Re: Looking at 2001 Mercury 3.3 for my CP16
Post by: Gerry on October 14, 2020, 08:13:13 AM
I see two problems:  short shaft and no reverse.  And 2 strokes are polluters.  I use reverse in our marina all of the time.
Title: Re: Looking at 2001 Mercury 3.3 for my CP16
Post by: konstan on October 14, 2020, 09:01:29 AM
Main reason I was thinking of going with a short shaft is that because here in the lowcountry SC you go a ways before you have more than a couple feet of water beneath you... Seriously though, how bad will a short shaft be?
Title: Re: Looking at 2001 Mercury 3.3 for my CP16
Post by: konstan on October 19, 2020, 12:45:50 AM
Since it was close, I just trailered my boat 2 miles to where the motor seller was. I wanted to see it mounted on the bracket. Looked perfect.

Took it out on the water Saturday. Really glad it had the regular shaft. It?s pretty shallow around here especially at low tide.
Title: Re: Looking at 2001 Mercury 3.3 for my CP16
Post by: Ken J on October 20, 2020, 07:39:39 PM
Short shaft is no problem at all on a 16 - and I have no problem with no reverse - only needed for backing out of a slip - then just turn around and go - my view is if you need it for docking your coming in too fast two strokes tend to be less heavy than 4 strokes
Title: Re: Looking at 2001 Mercury 3.3 for my CP16
Post by: konstan on October 23, 2020, 09:28:18 PM
Yes forgot to mention that, it spins 180 to go in 'reverse' so I have that covered. The motor came with spare pins and a receipt for new carb, new fuel tank, etc that was just done. Not bad for $400 -- here in Low Country people want crazy money for old motors from like 1970's; in all, this was a pretty good buy.
Title: Re: Looking at 2001 Mercury 3.3 for my CP16
Post by: kickingbug1 on November 05, 2020, 02:59:49 PM
   i had a mercury 4 hp 4 stoke on my catalina 18. being a single cylinder it vibrated like crazy and i never could get it to run right. i replaced it with a 1994 johnson 4 hp two stroke twin. starts easy, doesnt mind unleaded gas, idles well and being a twin cylinder runs very smooth. forward and neutral not a problem and its also half the weight. give me a two stroke any day
Title: Re: Looking at 2001 Mercury 3.3 for my CP16
Post by: konstan on November 05, 2020, 07:36:10 PM
Dunno if I?d say vibration has been an issue... I love having the greater range available to me and it starts on the 1st pull... I also like the smell of the 2 stroke but I realize that?s not for everyone...